求英语高手帮我翻译一段文章！

我需要翻译一段英语文章，用翻译软件都不太好~我英语太烂了，请高手帮我翻译下~软件自动翻译的不要~~谢谢了~~

The accession of China to the World Trade Organization has marked an apparent increase in tensions concerning trade relations between China and the United States. This dynamic is particularly noteworthy considering that the US is China’s largest export market and, currently, the US’ trade deficit with China is larger than ever. As one of the largest exporters of low-cost labor-intensive goods, China presents somewhat of a predicament to the US in terms of its potential for causing material injury to US domestic markets. As a response, the US has appealed to trade remedy measures such as the imposition of anti-dumping duties, which are designed to offset ‘unfair’ trade practices. Currently, China has the largest number of anti-dumping investigations initiated against it of any of the US’ trading partners. Yet, the methodology that the US uses for determining dumping margins for ‘non-market economies’ like China differs from market economies and is significantly unfavorable towards Chinese firms. This paper examines how the US has been responding to some Chinese imports utilizing trade defense/remedy measures by looking at US anti-dumping procedure and anti-dumping case law. It also considers the forces of US domestic industries and constituents in the process, looks at questionable practices by the US and addresses the future of US anti-dumping measures towards China.

Since the People’s Republic of China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, there has been a notable increase in tensions concerning trade relations between China and the United States. China’s enormous economy presents a predicament for many members of the WTO but it especially gives rise to feelings of unease for China’s largest trade market: the US. China is one of the world’s largest low-cost producers of goods in labor-intensive sectors such as textiles, food (agriculture), chemicals and electronics. The problem is that, when a country like China, floods a foreign market (like the US) with low-price goods, this may present an unfair advantage for the exporter. Such ‘dumping’ of goods is essentially, therefore, exporting at a price either below the cost of production, below the home-market price or sometimes, as will be shown in China’s case, below a third country price.1 The result can bring about less-than-fair-value goods and these have the potential to threaten or injure a domestic industry.